Which configuration item should be set to false to significantly improve data ingestion performance?
A. AUTO_KV_JSON
B. BREAK_ONLY_BEFORE_DATE
C. SHOULD_LINEMERGE
D. ANNOTATE_PUNCT
Explanation: This configuration item determines whether Splunk software merges multiple
lines into single events. By default, it is set to true, which means that Splunk software
attempts to merge lines that do not start with a timestamp into the previous line that has a
timestamp. This can improve the accuracy of event breaking, but it can also degrade the
performance of data ingestion, as it requires more processing and memory resources.
Setting SHOULD_LINEMERGE to false can significantly improve data ingestion
performance, especially for data sources that have consistent event boundaries and do not
need line merging. However, this can also result in incorrect event breaking for some data
sources that have multi-line events or variable formats.
The other options are incorrect because they do not have a significant impact on data
ingestion performance. Option A is incorrect because AUTO_KV_JSON is a configuration
item that enables automatic key-value extraction for JSON data. It does not affect data
ingestion performance, as it only applies to search-time processing. Option B is incorrect
because BREAK_ONLY_BEFORE_DATE is a configuration item that controls how Splunk
software breaks events based on timestamps. It does not affect data ingestion
performance, as it only applies to search-time processing. Option D is incorrect because
ANNOTATE_PUNCT is a configuration item that adds punctuation metadata to events for
faster field extraction. It does not affect data ingestion performance, as it only applies to
search-time processing.
In a large cloud customer environment with many (>100) dynamically created endpoint systems, each with a UF already deployed, what is the best approach for associating these systems with an appropriate serverclass on the deployment server?
A. Work with the cloud orchestration team to create a common host-naming convention for these systems so a simple pattern can be used in the serverclass.conf whitelist attribute.
B. Create a CSV lookup file for each severclass, manually keep track of the endpoints within this CSV file, and leverage the whitelist.from_pathname attribute in serverclass.conf.
C. Work with the cloud orchestration team to dynamically insert an appropriate clientName setting into each endpoint’s local/deploymentclient.conf which can be matched by whitelist in serverclass.conf.
D. Using an installation bootstrap script run a CLI command to assign a clientName setting and permit serverclass.conf whitelist simplification.
Explanation: In a large cloud customer environment with many (>100) dynamically created endpoint systems, each with a UF already deployed, the best approach for associating these systems with an appropriate serverclass on the deployment server is to work with the cloud orchestration team to dynamically insert an appropriate clientName setting into each endpoint’s local/deploymentclient.conf which can be matched by whitelist in serverclass.conf. This approach allows the deployment server to easily identify and group the endpoints based on their clientName values, which can be customized according to the customer’s needs. For example, the clientName can be set to include information such as the endpoint’s role, function, location, or owner. The whitelist attribute in serverclass.conf can then use a simple pattern or regular expression to match the clientName values and assign the endpoints to the corresponding serverclass.
A customer has downloaded the Splunk App for AWS from Splunk base and installed it in a search head cluster following the instructions using the deployer. A power user modifies a dashboard in the app on one of the search head cluster members. The app containing an updated dashboard is upgraded to the latest version by following the instructions via the deployer. What happens?
A. The updated dashboard will not be deployed globally to all users, due to the conflict with the power user’s modified version of the dashboard.
B. Applying the search head cluster bundle will fail due to the conflict.
C. The updated dashboard will be available to the power user.
D. The updated dashboard will not be available to the power user; they will see their modified version.
Explanation: This is because the Splunk App for AWS is a prebuilt app that is installed on
the deployer and pushed to the search head cluster members. When a power user
modifies a dashboard in the app on one of the search head cluster members, the changes
are stored in the local directory of that member. When the app is upgraded to the latest
version by following the instructions via the deployer, the changes in the default directory of
the app are overwritten, but the changes in the local directory are preserved. Therefore, the
power user will still see their modified version of the dashboard, while other users will see
the updated version of the dashboard.
The other options are incorrect because they do not reflect what happens when a prebuilt
app is upgraded in a search head cluster. Option A is incorrect because the updated
dashboard will be deployed globally to all users, except for the power user who modified it.
Option B is incorrect because applying the search head cluster bundle will not fail due to
the conflict, as the local changes are not pushed back to the deployer. Option C is incorrect
because the updated dashboard will not be available to the power user, as their local
changes will take precedence over the default changes.
When adding a new search head to a search head cluster (SHC), which of the following scenarios occurs?
A. The new search head connects to the captain and replays any recent configuration changes to bring it up to date.
B. The new search head connects to the deployer and replays any recent configuration changes to bring it up to date.
C. The new search head connects to the captain and pulls the most recently deployed bundle. It then connects to the deployer and replays any recent configuration changes to bring it up to date.
D. The new search head connects to the deployer and pulls the most recently deployed bundle. It then connects to the captain and replays any recent configuration changes to bring it up to date.
Explanation: When adding a new search head to a search head cluster (SHC), the
following scenario occurs:
The new search head connects to the deployer and pulls the most recently
deployed bundle. The deployer is a Splunk instance that manages the app
configuration bundle for the SHC. The bundle contains the app configurations and
knowledge objects that are common to all the search heads in the cluster. The
new search head downloads and extracts the bundle to its etc/shcluster/apps
directory.
The new search head connects to the captain and replays any recent configuration
changes to bring it up to date. The captain is one of the search heads in the cluster
that coordinates the cluster activities and maintains the cluster state. The captain
keeps track of any configuration changes that are made on any of the cluster
members, such as creating or modifying dashboards, reports, alerts, or macros.
The new search head requests these changes from the captain and applies them
to its own configuration.
By following these steps, the new search head synchronizes its configuration with the rest
of the cluster and becomes a fully functional member.
A customer has been using Splunk for one year, utilizing a single/all-in-one instance. This single Splunk server is now struggling to cope with the daily ingest rate. Also, Splunk has become a vital system in day-to-day operations making high availability a consideration for the Splunk service. The customer is unsure how to design the new environment topology in order to provide this. Which resource would help the customer gather the requirements for their new architecture?
A. Direct the customer to the docs.splunk.com and tell them that all the information to help them select the right design is documented there.
B. Ask the customer to engage with the sales team immediately as they probably need a larger license.
C. Refer the customer to answers.splunk.com as someone else has probably already designed a system that meets their requirements.
D. Refer the customer to the Splunk Validated Architectures document in order to guide them through which approved architectures could meet their requirements.
Explanation: The Splunk Validated Architectures (SVAs) are proven reference architectures for stable, efficient and repeatable Splunk deployments. They offer topology options that consider a wide array of organizational requirements, so the customer can easily understand and find a topology that is right for their needs. The SVAs also provide design principles and best practices to help the customer build an environment that is easier to maintain and troubleshoot. The SVAs are available on the Splunk website and can be customized using the Interactive Splunk Validated Architecture (iSVA) tool. The other options are incorrect because they do not provide the customer with a reliable and tailored resource to help them design their new architecture. Option A is too vague and does not point the customer to a specific document or section. Option B is irrelevant and does not address the customer’s architectural needs. Option C is unreliable and does not guarantee that the customer will find a suitable solution for their requirements.
When monitoring and forwarding events collected from a file containing unstructured textual events, what is the difference in the Splunk2Splunk payload traffic sent between a universal forwarder (UF) and indexer compared to the Splunk2Splunk payload sent between a heavy forwarder (HF) and the indexer layer? (Assume that the file is being monitored locally on the forwarder.)
A. The payload format sent from the UF versus the HF is exactly the same. The payload size is identical because they’re both sending 64K chunks.
B. The UF sends a stream of data containing one set of medata fields to represent the entire stream, whereas the HF sends individual events, each with their own metadata fields attached, resulting in a lager payload.
C. The UF will generally send the payload in the same format, but only when the sourcetype is specified in the inputs.conf and EVENT_BREAKER_ENABLE is set to true.
D. The HF sends a stream of 64K TCP chunks with one set of metadata fields attached to represent the entire stream, whereas the UF sends individual events, each with their own metadata fields attached.
Explanation: The difference in the Splunk2Splunk payload traffic sent between a universal forwarder (UF) and indexer compared to the payload sent between a heavy forwarder (HF) and the indexer layer is that the UF sends a stream of data containing one set of metadata fields to represent the entire stream, whereas the HF sends individual events, each with their own metadata fields attached, resulting in a larger payload. This is because the UF does not parse or index the data before forwarding it, but rather sends it as raw data in 64K TCP chunks. The metadata fields, such as host, source, sourcetype, etc., are applied to the entire stream based on the inputs.conf configuration. The HF, on the other hand, parses and indexes the data before forwarding it, which means that it breaks the data into individual events and assigns metadata fields to each event based on props.conf and transforms.conf configuration. This results in a larger payload size, but also allows for more granular control over event processing and routing.
Page 1 out of 15 Pages |